Monokote MK-6
- Grace Construction Products a division of WR Grace
- manufacturer details and additional products (2) »
BACKGROUNDProduct image • Product description • Contact information
MasterFormat Number(s): 07 81 16, 07 81 00, 07 80 00, 07 00 00
62 Whittemore Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02140
- Manufacturer-direct
- Distributor(/Representative)
PRODUCT DETAILS2.1 SUSTAINABLE STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATIONS • 2.2 SUSTAINABLE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA • 2.3 SUSTAINABLE COMPOSITION OF PRODUCT
2.1 SUSTAINABLE STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATIONS
| CERTIFICATION NAME | Standards Organization | Standard Number | Testing Organization | Test Date |
| Other | Green Seal | GS-11 | -- | -- |
2.2 SUSTAINABLE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
| List essential performance and physical characteristics: (ie. Fire resistance rating, vapor permeability, strength, etc.) | |||||||
|
Characteristic:
Fire Resistance
|
Measurement test (UL, ASTM, FM, etc):
ASTM E119 and UL 263
|
Results (value,units):
Up to 4 hour rated Floor, Roof &Structural Members
|
|||||
|
Characteristic:
Flame Spread and Smoke Development
|
Measurement test (UL, ASTM, FM, etc):
ASTM E84 and UL 723
|
Results (value,units):
Flame Spread = 0, Smoke Development = 0
|
|||||
|
Characteristic:
Resistance to Mold Growth
|
Measurement test (UL, ASTM, FM, etc):
ASTM G21
|
Results (value,units):
No mold growth after 28 days
|
|||||
|
Characteristic:
Corrosion Resistance
|
Measurement test (UL, ASTM, FM, etc):
ASTM E937
|
Results (value,units):
Does not contribute to corrosion
|
|||||
|
Characteristic:
Bond Strength
|
Measurement test (UL, ASTM, FM, etc):
ASTM E736
|
Results (value,units):
339 psf (16.2 KPa)
|
|||||
|
All testing conducted by a third party accredited testing laboratory
|
2.3 SUSTAINABLE COMPOSITION OF PRODUCT
| List the primary materials in a representative sample of the reported product. (List actual material - not trade name) | |||||||
|
Gypsum, Polystyrene (some post-industrial recycled), and recycled newspaper.
|
|||||||
| Does the product contain any California Proposition 65 chemicals? | Yes No | |
| Is the MSDS and/or a list of toxics available on company website? | Yes No |
|
The California Proposition 65 list contains many naturally occurring materials such as minerals including gypsum which are commonly found in construction products. Since levels of exposure set by the State of California under Proposition 65 are extremely low, often significantly below background or ambient concentrations, many manufacturers (including us) have taken a conservative approach to the law and have applied warning labels to their products for California.
|
| Does the product contain any recycled content material? | Yes No | ||||||||
|
Post-Consumer: Percent by weight of total product: 8 range |
Post-Consumer: Description of post-consumer content: Polystyrene and Newspaper
|
||||||||
|
Pre-Consumer: Percent by weight of total product: 0 range |
Total: Percent by weight of total product: 8 |
||||||||
| If yes, are these measurements certified? | Yes No | ||||||||
| Does the product contain any rapidly renewable materials? | Yes No | ||||||||
| For wet-applied products, what is the VOC content? | |||||||||
|
0.0 g/l |
Measurement Standard:
EPA Reference Test Method 24
|
||||||||
| Will adding the recommended pigments increase VOCs beyond what is stated? | Yes No | ||||||||
| Does the product contain any added Urea Formaldehyde? | Yes No | ||||||||
PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE3.1 LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS • Manufacturer Comments • 3.2 Material Extraction and Transportation • 3.3 MANUFACTURING • 3.4 CONSTRUCTION • 3.5 FACILITY OPERATIONS • 3.6 DECONSTRUCTION / RECYCLING PHASE
3.1 LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS
| Has this product, or any product in the product category, gone through a life cycle assessment (LCA)? | Yes No | ||||||||
| Is an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) available for this product, or any products in this category? (An Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) provides Life Cycle Information in a standardized format as described generally by ISO 14025, and specifically for building products by ISO 21930.) | Yes No | ||||||||
| Was the EPD third party verified? | |||||||||
Manufacturer Comments
3.2 Material Extraction and Transportation
| Location(s) of manufacturing facility(s) producing the reported product | |||||||
|
City, State/Province, Zip, Country:
Ajax, Ontario, L1S 3C6, Canada
|
City, State/Province, Zip, Country:
Santa Ana, California, 92707, USA
|
||||||
|
City, State/Province, Zip, Country:
Irondale, Alabama, 35210, USA
|
|||||||
| What approximate percent of materials and/or assemblies by weight are sourced from ISO 14001 certified suppliers? | |||||||
|
don't know
|
|||||||
|
The raw materials used in the Monokote MK-6 are sourced primarily from locations closest to each of the three manufacturing plants that make the product. Grace offers project specific letters to address the regional avalability of the Monokote MK-6 and the raw materials used to manufacture the product based on the project site location.
|
3.3 MANUFACTURING
| Does the company maintain ISO 14001 registration for some or all manufacturing facilities, including international locations? | |||||||||
|
some
|
If some, identify which plant(s):
Curtis Bay, MD; Passirana, Italy; St. Boi, Spain; Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Dueren, Germany; Widnes, United Kingdom; Worms, Germany; Rottenburg/Hailfingen, Germany; Shanghai – Minhang, China; Tuzla, Turkey
|
||||||||
| Does the company generate energy on-site from renewable resources? | Yes No | ||||||||
| What is the company's specified goal for reducing energy consumption? | |||||||||
|
Reduce 10% of the energy cost and consumption rate in 2009.
|
What steps has the company taken to reduce energy consumption of the manufacturing process?
Air compressor efficiency and low energy lighting retrofit.
|
What is the percent reduction achieved by unit of product over the specified period?
10 |
|||||||
|
Enter Base year for period.
2008
|
Enter Reporting year for period.
2009
|
||||||||
| What is the company's specified goal for reducing potable water use? | |||||||||
|
Currently there is very little or no potable water use in the manufacturing process.
|
|||||||||
| What is the company's specified goal for reducing solid waste? | |||||||||
|
Reduce solid waste developed from raw material packaging and shipping packaging.
|
What steps has the company taken to reduce solid-waste created from the manufacturing process?
Recycling initiatives for cardboard, paper, plastic and wood pallets.
|
What is the percent reduction achieved by unit of product over the specified period?
20 |
|||||||
|
Enter Base year for period.
2008
|
Enter Reporting year for period.
2009
|
||||||||
| What percent of the waste from the facility goes to hazardous waste, landfill, Waste-To-Energy (WTE), recycled (offsite)? | |||||||||
|
hazardous waste:
0 |
landfill:
80 |
Waste-To-Energy (WTE):
0 |
|||||||
|
recycled (offsite):
20 |
|||||||||
| Are any Hazardous Air Pollutants (as defined by EPA) created, used, or released during the manufacture of the product? | Yes No | ||||||||
|
Are any hazardous chemicals created, used, or released during the manufacture of the product which must be reported under the State Right to Know Act (SARA), Section 313 via the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)? (The absence of hazardous chemicals or air pollutants in manufacture is laudable. However the presence of such hazards is not a simple indicator of environmental impact. Which listed hazards are present, how they are handled, the magnitude of emissions, and the extent and effectiveness of efforts to minimize creation, use, and releases of such hazards, are all important in assessing environmental responsibility. While it can be problematic to try to compare the performance of different companies, a record of TRI releases by company found on the EPA website allows review of a single company over time. http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/tris/tris_query.html) |
Yes No | ||||||||
3.4 CONSTRUCTION
| Shipping and Packing Materials (select all that apply for each) | |||||||||
|
Pallets:
Recyclable
|
Boxes:
Recyclable
|
Packing filler:
Recyclable
|
|||||||
|
Containers:
Recyclable
|
Wrapping:
Recyclable
|
||||||||
| Has the company reduced the amount of packaging required? | Yes No | ||||||||
| Are there programs in place to reduce environmental impacts of packaging? | Yes No | ||||||||
|
If yes, please describe program and results.
Take back program for product packaging (pallets)
|
|||||||||
| Does the design of this product include features that reduce amount of excess material/overage required at installation? | Yes No | ||||||||
|
What is the typical % excess material/overage?
15 |
What are the disposition options for excess material?
Disposed as construction waste per local jurisdiction requirements.
|
||||||||
| Final Cleaning: Do recommended final cleaning materials emit any known airborne toxins or VOCs? | Yes No | ||||||||
3.5 FACILITY OPERATIONS
| Does the product have an extended life, based on improved durability as defined by ISO 14021? | Yes No | ||||||||
3.6 DECONSTRUCTION / RECYCLING PHASE
| Is there a maintenance/replacement agreement? | Yes No | ||||||||
| Is there a buy-back or take-back program for products at end-of-life? | Yes No | ||||||||
| If yes, is there a cost to the customer? | |||||||||
| Is the entire product reusable? | Yes No | ||||||||
| Are components of the product reusable? | Yes No | ||||||||
| Is the product currently being recycled into another product? | Yes No | ||||||||
| Does product require disposal in a landfill? | Yes No | ||||||||
|
If yes, what classification of landfill?
Class III - Nonhazardous waste
|
If no, what is the recommended disposition?
|
||||||||
|
While most waste of Monokote MK-6 is disposed as construction waste, it is Grace's understanding that the product has been used as compost. However, Grace has never measured this feature per an ASTM Standard.
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION4.1 Stewardship • 4.2 Transparency of Information • Manufacturer Comments
4.1 Stewardship
4.2 Transparency of Information
| Is the environmental information reported in this form available on the website? | Yes No | ||||||||
|
If yes link to webpage(s):
http://www.grace.com/About/EHS/default.aspx
|
|||||||||
| Does the company have an environmental policy or sustainability plan available on its website? | Yes No | ||||||||
|
If yes link to webpage(s):
http://www.grace.com/About/EHS/default.aspx
|
|||||||||
| Does the company produce a corporate sustainability report for public review? | Yes No | ||||||||
| Ingredients or materials that comprise the product are fully disclosed on product packaging or in materials accompanying the product | Yes No | ||||||||
Subscribe